In the 9th chapter of Mark’s Gospel, a helpless father desperately implores Jesus to rescue his son. He stands uneasily yet candidly at the crossroads of belief and unbelief. Jesus meets him there.
This kind of faith is not an unquestioning allegiance to ideology. It isn’t reflected in bumper-sticker quips like, “God said it, I believe it, that settles it.”
The simple, soulful confession of this kind of faith is, “Lord, I believe, help thou my unbelief.” This kind of faith exhibits the virtue of skepticism.
In the field of philosophy there are (at least…) two types of skepticism: Academic and Pyrrhonian. Academic skepticism asserts the impossibility of truly knowing anything. Its fatal flaw is its own logic: i.e., How can we truly know that it is impossible to truly know anything?
But Pyrrhonian skepticism accommodates an open-minded pursuit of truth. It acknowledges the severe difficulty of apprehending ultimate knowledge while allowing the possibility of knowing truly.
“Christian faith in God is not a naïve basic truth. It is unfaith that has been overcome” Jurgen Moltmann
Copyright Scott Burnett 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
That's cool - Academic v Pyrrhonian skepticism. It reminds me of the deductive versus inductive versions of reasoning. Pyrrhonian skepticism feels like a cousin of Inductive reasoning ... exploring outward from a set of truth kernels.
Thanks for commenting, cb -- you're probably on to something with that connection.
You can see a more complete treatment of Pyrrhonism here.
I don't want to play write now, but I would like to talk. Let M Rivers know how to contact if open to it. Blessings. M
Post a Comment